What Is Section 9 of the Trade Marks Act?
Section 9 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 sets out the absolute grounds for refusal — characteristics of a mark that make it inherently unregistrable regardless of whether any other mark exists. If your mark falls under Section 9, the examiner raises an objection even if the mark is completely unique.
Marks refused under Section 9 include:
- Marks devoid of distinctive character — Cannot distinguish your goods/services from others
- Descriptive marks — Describes the kind, quality, quantity, purpose, value, or geographic origin of goods
- Customary trade signs — Words that have become customary in the current language or bona fide commercial practice
- Deceptive marks — Likely to deceive the public or cause confusion
- Marks against public policy — Contrary to law, morality, or public order
- Shape marks — Shape that results from the nature of goods, necessary for technical result, or gives substantial value
Most Common Section 9 Objections in India
| Mark Type | Why Section 9 Is Raised | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Descriptive quality words | Directly describes product quality | "BEST QUALITY", "SUPERIOR", "PREMIUM" |
| Generic product category names | Describes what the product is | "CHAI" for tea, "CURRY" for spice mixes |
| Geographic names | Describes the origin of goods | "DELHI SWEETS", "MUMBAI MASALA" |
| Laudatory terms | Merely praises the product | "EXCELLENT", "WORLD CLASS", "NO.1" |
| Ingredient names | Directly describes what the product contains | "HARIDRA" (turmeric) for turmeric products |
| Purely numeric marks | Numbers alone lack distinctiveness | "500", "100" alone as a mark |
| Common surnames | Very common surnames lack distinctiveness | "SHARMA ENTERPRISES" — "Sharma" too common |
Winning Arguments for a Section 9 Reply
There are four main legal arguments that overcome Section 9 objections:
1
Argument: Mark is suggestive, not descriptive — There is a legal distinction between a mark that directly describes (cannot register) and one that merely suggests or alludes to (can register). "NAUKRI" suggests employment but does not directly describe a job listing service. Argue your mark requires imagination to connect it to the product.
2
Argument: Acquired distinctiveness / secondary meaning — Even a descriptive word can be registered if it has acquired distinctiveness through long and extensive use. The word "APPLE" is descriptive for apples but is a strong trademark for electronics because consumers associate it with Apple Inc. Evidence: years of use, sales figures, advertising spend, consumer recognition.
3
Argument: Composite mark is distinctive — Even if individual words are descriptive, the overall composite mark (combination of elements) may be distinctive. "BEST + [unique word]" — the compound may be registrable. Or "descriptive word + distinctive logo" — the combination creates distinctiveness.
4
Argument: Precedent — similar marks already registered — If the IP India register already contains similar descriptive marks that were accepted, cite these as precedent. The examiner's acceptance of those marks supports consistency in accepting yours.
Evidence to Attach with Section 9 Reply
| Evidence Type | Why It Helps | Format |
|---|---|---|
| Dated invoices/bills (earliest available) | Proves date of first commercial use | PDF copies of oldest invoices |
| Advertising and marketing materials | Shows brand building investment and public exposure | Scanned ads, digital campaign screenshots with dates |
| Sales figures / turnover data | Demonstrates commercial success and market presence | Affidavit from CA or management accounts |
| Press coverage and news articles | Shows brand recognition in media/public consciousness | Printed/PDF news articles mentioning the brand |
| Product packaging with brand | Shows mark in use on actual products | Physical packaging photographs |
| Website screenshots with archive dates | Proves online presence and duration | Wayback Machine screenshots with dates |
| Consumer declarations / testimonials | Shows consumer recognition of the brand | Affidavits from consumers or dealers |
Special Case: Geographic Name Objections
Geographic marks (city names, regional names) are a common Section 9 objection in India. Strategies to overcome:
- The geographic name is used in a distinctive, non-geographic sense — "AMAZON" is a geographic region (Amazon River) but is used distinctively for retail services. Similarly, "PATAGONIA" is a geographic area but is a strong clothing brand.
- The geographic name is not well-known in connection with the product — "Paris" is well-known in connection with fashion. But a less-famous geographic name used for an unrelated product may be registrable.
- Composite mark — "JAIPUR RUGS" as a complete composite has been registered because the combination has a distinctive character even though individual elements are geographic/generic.
Frequently Asked Questions
Yes — through acquired distinctiveness (Section 9(3) of the Trade Marks Act). If a mark has been used so extensively that the public recognises it as identifying a specific brand (not just describing the product), it can be registered despite being descriptive. Proving this requires strong evidence of long use and public recognition.
A descriptive mark directly describes a characteristic of the product ('COLD AND CREAMY' for ice cream). A suggestive mark requires imagination, thought, or perception to connect it to the product ('COPPERTONE' for sunscreen — requires you to think about tanning). Suggestive marks are registrable; purely descriptive marks generally are not.
If the examiner maintains the objection even after your reply, you proceed to a hearing where you can make oral arguments. If refused after the hearing, you can appeal to the Intellectual Property Appellate Board (IPAB) or the High Court having jurisdiction over your state.
Conduct a self-test: (1) Does the mark directly describe what the product is or does? (2) Is it a common word used in the trade? (3) Is it a geographic name associated with the product's origin? (4) Is it purely laudatory? If yes to any of these, discuss with an attorney before filing.
You cannot materially change a mark after filing. Minor corrections are allowed via Form TM-16. If the mark itself is the problem, the better approach may be to respond to the objection arguing distinctiveness, rather than trying to alter the mark.
Get Expert Trademark Help
Our specialists handle search, filing, objection replies, and follow-up. Fixed pricing, no surprises.